Tap here to turn on desktop notifications to get the news sent straight to you. Bush repeat By Joseph A. Each of the four have substantial supporting documentation, which includes the Congressional Record, private correspondence from government officials, public statements by President Bush and other Administration officials, press accounts, and court documents.
Bush to the U. House of Representatives Battle of the Intro - Aug 4 The first section of this article must state that this is a minority-led movement.
This is not a mainstream topic. The terms "some people This article is not legitimate when the writing does not qualify the people or lack thereof in this movement. This page needs to become more neutral. You asked for citations supporting the poll figures: Of course the "actions and commentary" by people on any subject represents a minority, since most people have not acted or commented at all, so in that sense the meaning is trivial.
Of those who have acted or commented, have the majority opposed impeachment? The movement to impeach George W. Bush includes such actions and commentary, but more broadly, it refers to a general public sentiment, which may be inferred, but can hardly be asserted as a quantifiable fact.
The verifiable facts, duly summarized in this introduction, could be paraphrased "polls tend to indicate that more than a quarter and fewer than half currently advocate impeachment". However, there is no justification for simply inserting the unqualified word "minority" as you have done. And this would be an adjective.
This article is quite unbalanced. You gung-ho editors are clearly from the left. This was my reaction, too. I also think it is not a very good article for an encyclopedia.
At best, it is incorrectly titled. But it is popular now, to imagine that somehow this might happen. In a couple of years, Bush will be out of office in the normal course of events. Meanwhile it could certainly be less pov. Among other things its way too long Look what was found in the The Washington Post today In constrast, he seems to fear it, writing that politically "Impeachment is not merely a bad idea, but the single worst course of action that Democrats could possibly undertake".
This is not sufficiently notable to mention in the intro. I was making the same edit myself when the text disappeared under my feet.
Neutrality is not achieved by piling on an equal measure of opposing POV, without regard to notability. A better way to assure the fairness and neutrality of the intro is to stick to relevant facts, presented without extra spin.
Timneu22 - I hope you can see that we are trying to be fair and balanced about this: I gave you a cogent argument why that adjective in this case a noun used as an adjective was not called for in this context. Your justification based on poll figures misses the point.
Please read my previous comments carefully.The Impeachment of George W. Bush make the case for George W. Bush's impeachment on the September 24 episode of the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service in a recent analysis.
The. The Center for Constitutional Rights compiled a book titled, Articles of Impeachment Against George W. Bush. William Goodman, the Center's legal director, wrote the introduction to the book. William Goodman, the Center's legal director, wrote the introduction to the book. The impeachment of George W.
Bush, President of the United States, is warranted by his initiation and continuation of the Iraq war. The initiation and continuation of the war constitutes a high.
At the Constitutional Convention, the drafters had originally restricted impeachment to "treason" and "bribery:" But George Mason, one of the influential delegates, found those terms insufficient, according to Articles of Impeachment Against George W.
Bush, a new and highly informative book by the Center for Constitutional Rights. In-depth politics coverage and political opinion.
And there would be only one remedy an analysis of articles of impeachment of george w bush for Trump's disrespect: impeachment The latest UK and World news. This will be the subject of Count 2 from my multipart series on Why George W.
Bush must be Impeached. The Impeachment Case Against George W. Bush - Count 2: Domestic Espionage. analysis .